Your answer is wise. It is a great conversation, thank you.
âin a complex society we are required to rely on those with different skills and specializations to do things that are in our collective best interests. We want this, because without this, we will not be able to maintain the complex systems that make our lives so relatively easy.â
agree, well said
âbut regardless of you being right, we should still give competence and weight and allow delegation to othersâ
I donât care, obviously, to be right, I am here to look for a good conversation with you and anyone else interested, in order to find a good possible option. And, yes, thereâs always a downside. Thatâs actually the trick, not to have the perfect system, but a learning system. To ALLOW mistakes, not to forbid them. Itâs like in trading, you need retests, you need dips, you need some mistakes to learn and grow.
âThere will be no perfect system because human beings are involved.â
oh thatâs not because of humans, itâs because good and bad are not part of nature, in physics thereâs no good or bad, so you donât have âperfectionâ but âadaptationâ I like to say we need an adaptive and learning system. Our community should fall, but learn from falling. No need to tear anything apart.
My interest is letâs say we use a yes/no question, without doubting of the yes/no, once we have 51% yes and 49% no, are we really sure we should do the yes? Thatâs my main concern.
Maybe in that case itâs better to discuss things more, because what could stop in that case to tear the community in two, or better, to tear the market cap in two?